news

3GPP SCAS vs. Real-World Attacks: How to Bridge the Gap with Advanced Testing

As 5G continues to revolutionize industries, security has become a central concern. With the increased complexity of 5G networks, protecting them from cyber threats requires rigorous security measures. The 3GPP Security Assurance Specifications (SCAS) provide a comprehensive framework for testing the security of 5G network components to ensure compliance with standardized security requirements. However, while SCAS lays the groundwork for testing 5G systems, real-world cyberattacks often evolve faster than standards can anticipate.

In this blog, we’ll explore the role of 3GPP SCAS in securing 5G networks, discuss the limitations of compliance testing when faced with advanced real-world attacks, and highlight how integrating advanced testing techniques can bridge the gap to create more robust defenses.

1. What Is 3GPP SCAS and Why Does It Matter?

The 3GPP Security Assurance Specifications (SCAS) are part of a broader effort to standardize security testing for telecommunications networks. SCAS defines a set of security requirements and testing procedures for network elements such as the 5G Core, gNodeB (base stations), and other critical infrastructure components. The goal of SCAS is to ensure that 5G network elements meet baseline security criteria before they are deployed in live networks.

SCAS plays a crucial role in pre-compliance and compliance testing, helping network operators and vendors:

  • Validate the security of network equipment.

  • Mitigate vulnerabilities before deployment.

  • Ensure adherence to 3GPP security standards.

While SCAS is highly effective in ensuring that network elements meet predefined security specifications, it’s important to recognize that compliance alone does not guarantee protection against all real-world threats. Many sophisticated attacks, such as zero-day exploits or advanced persistent threats (APTs), operate outside the scope of standardized testing. This creates a gap between SCAS-based compliance and the reality of dynamic cyber threats.

2. Key Challenges: SCAS Testing vs. Real-World Attacks

Though SCAS offers a solid foundation for security assurance, there are several challenges that arise when addressing real-world attack scenarios:

  • a. Static vs. Evolving Threats

    SCAS testing is designed to validate network components against a predefined set of vulnerabilities and security requirements. However, in the real world, threat actors are constantly developing new attack techniques, such as exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities or targeting unknown weaknesses in software and hardware. These evolving threats may not be fully captured by SCAS test cases, leaving networks vulnerable.

  • b. Limited Scope of SCAS Testing

    While SCAS focuses on critical aspects of 5G security (e.g., encryption, authentication, integrity), it does not comprehensively cover all possible attack vectors, especially in dynamic, multi-vendor environments. For example, supply chain vulnerabilities, insider threats, or sophisticated multi-stage attacks that target both the core and the Radio Access Network (RAN) may not be fully addressed in SCAS specifications.

  • c. Real-World Attack Complexity

    Real-world cyberattacks often involve a combination of tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), such as social engineering, advanced malware, lateral movement, and exfiltration of data. These types of attacks are difficult to simulate in a controlled testing environment that adheres strictly to SCAS guidelines, making it harder to predict how real attackers might exploit vulnerabilities.

  • d. Focus on Component-Level Security

    SCAS primarily focuses on validating the security of individual network components, but real-world attacks often target the interaction between components, interfaces, and configurations. Without considering the broader context of system-wide vulnerabilities, relying solely on SCAS testing may result in blind spots where attackers can exploit misconfigurations or gaps between network elements.

3. Bridging the Gap: How Advanced Testing Enhances SCAS Compliance

While SCAS remains an essential part of 5G security testing, integrating advanced testing techniques can help network operators and security teams bridge the gap between compliance and real-world attack preparedness. Here are several key strategies for enhancing SCAS testing:

  • a. Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT)

    Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) goes beyond SCAS by actively probing the network to identify weak points that may be exploited in real-world scenarios. While SCAS focuses on ensuring that security functions perform as expected, VAPT simulates the actions of an attacker to expose unknown vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, or system weaknesses.

    • Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly scan 5G network components and interfaces to detect known vulnerabilities that may not be fully covered by SCAS.
    • Penetration Testing: Conduct penetration tests that mimic real-world attack techniques to assess how resilient your network is to external or internal threats.
  • b. Scenario-Based Testing for Real-World Attack Simulation

    SCAS compliance ensures that components are tested in a controlled environment, but to prepare for real-world attacks, security teams must simulate real-world attack scenarios that include complex TTPs. Red teaming or attack simulation exercises can reveal vulnerabilities that standardized testing may miss.

    • Red Team Exercises: Deploy red teams to simulate an adversary attacking the network, targeting both known and unknown vulnerabilities in a realistic manner. These exercises can test how well your security teams respond to dynamic threats and can highlight gaps in your incident response processes.
    • Purple Teaming: Combine the strengths of red and blue teams to test and improve the network’s defenses in a collaborative approach. While red teams focus on offense (attacks), blue teams defend, and the two groups work together to find vulnerabilities.
  • c. Zero-Day Vulnerability Hunting

    While SCAS tests for known vulnerabilities, zero-day attacks exploit unknown vulnerabilities that haven’t been publicly disclosed. To address this gap, organizations must actively engage in bug bounty programs or fuzz testing to discover unknown weaknesses before attackers do.

    • Fuzz Testing: Introduce random or malformed data into network components to trigger unexpected behavior or crashes, which can uncover unknown vulnerabilities in software.
    • Bug Bounty Programs: Encourage external researchers and ethical hackers to discover vulnerabilities in your 5G network in exchange for rewards. This helps uncover zero-day vulnerabilities that SCAS testing alone may not reveal.
  • d. Dynamic Security Monitoring and Threat Intelligence

    In the real world, security doesn’t end after initial testing. Integrating dynamic security monitoring and threat intelligence into your testing strategy can help detect ongoing or emerging threats. While SCAS ensures a secure baseline, real-time monitoring can identify anomalies or attack patterns that signal a live threat.

    • SIEM (Security Information and Event Management): Use SIEM platforms to collect, analyze, and correlate data from multiple sources in real-time to detect threats that standard testing may miss.
    • Threat Intelligence Integration: Continuously update your security testing with the latest threat intelligence feeds to ensure that your defenses evolve with new attack trends.
  • e. Multi-Vendor and Interoperability Testing

    Since 5G networks often include components from multiple vendors, each with its own proprietary solutions, interoperability testing is essential. Attacks that target interactions between different vendor solutions or exploit inconsistencies between components can be devastating. Advanced testing should account for how different components work together in a real-world environment, including how they handle security between interfaces.

4. Best Practices for Bridging the SCAS-Real-World Gap

To strengthen your 5G security posture, consider the following best practices for integrating advanced testing with SCAS compliance:

  • a. Perform Regular Testing Beyond Compliance

    Security is not a one-time task, especially with evolving threats. Conduct regular testing that goes beyond SCAS compliance to include real-world attack scenarios, VAPT, and continuous threat monitoring.

  • b. Adopt a Layered Security Approach

    A multi-layered security strategy that combines SCAS testing with VAPT, red teaming, and continuous monitoring offers a holistic approach to security. This ensures that network components are secure at the individual level and that the network as a whole can resist real-world attacks.

  • c. Ensure Full Visibility Across the 5G Ecosystem

    Full visibility across the 5G ecosystem, from the core network to the RAN and edge devices, is crucial. Ensure that security testing is comprehensive and covers all network elements, APIs, and interfaces to prevent blind spots.

  • d. Collaborate with Industry Partners and Vendors

    Since 5G networks often rely on multi-vendor environments, collaboration with vendors and industry partners is key. Work closely with vendors to ensure timely patching of vulnerabilities, and ensure interoperability testing is part of your advanced testing strategy.

  • e. Stay Informed on Emerging Threats

    Cyber threats are constantly evolving. Stay informed by integrating the latest threat intelligence, tracking zero-day vulnerabilities, and learning from other industries and sectors that may face similar threats.

5. Conclusion

While 3GPP SCAS provides a critical foundation for 5G security, real-world attacks often exploit the gaps left by compliance-based testing. To protect against sophisticated and evolving threats, network operators must adopt advanced testing methods that go beyond SCAS compliance. By integrating VAPT, real-world attack simulations, zero-day vulnerability hunting, and continuous monitoring, 5G networks can build a more resilient and robust defense system.

Advanced testing, combined with SCAS compliance, ensures that your 5G network is not only secure in theory but also prepared for the real-world challenges posed by today’s cyber adversaries. Bridging the gap between SCAS and real-world security will ultimately safeguard the future of 5G communications and the industries that rely on them.